Competitor or Companion?
I was recently talking with
a friend who had a different perspective than mine. I noticed that whenever she
was about to express an opinion, she would say, "I'm sorry Tom, but I
believe..." Eventually I asked her why she kept apologizing. She
replied that she wanted to be sure that our relationship was solid enough that
it would not be damaged by our differences. I tried to assure her that we
would still be friends even if our perspectives differed. I valued the truth
enough to want to learn about her view of reality even if it was different
than my mine.
I believe that
relationships are everything and I've been wondering about why it is so hard to
develop a trusting relationship with someone with whom we disagree. I think it is
because trust requires giving up control which makes us vulnerable. If we are
not convinced that the other person loves us enough to protect us, then we dare
not trust them.
I think this may be why
it is so difficult to have discussions about human sexuality within the United Methodist Church.
The issue has so often been framed as a win-lose competition for control of the
church. I've come to the conclusion that it is not possible to trust a
person if they are seen as a competitor. This is because a competitor is someone
whose main objective is to win against an opponent. As long as we see
another person as our competitor vying for a mutually exclusive goal, then we
will not feel safe to engage them in an honest conversation. Fear comes from our weaknesses being used
against us.
But what if we re-framed
the issue within the church from a competition with winners and losers to companions seeking a common goal? That goal would
be learning how to live together and best make disciples of Jesus Christ for
the transformation of the world. If Jesus taught us to love our enemies, then how
much more true is it that we should love members of our own families and treat them
with respect even when we disagree? This is a ministry of reconciliation (2
Corinthians 5:16-19). It will include conversations where people can disagree
and still feel safe, valued and heard.